From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Naasira

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 11, 2007
43 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-08030.

September 11, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated June 15, 2006, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Claude C. Ramsey III, Bronx, N.Y. (Mitchell L. Perry of counsel), for appellant.

Loccisano Larkin, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Erica L. Ingebretsen of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In response to the defendant's prima facie showing of her entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578, 582-583; Odi v Lifetouch, Inc., 35 AD3d 420; see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; see also Olan v Farrell Lines, 64 NY2d 1092).


Summaries of

Byrd v. Naasira

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 11, 2007
43 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Byrd v. Naasira

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY BYRD, Appellant, v. BEY NAASIRA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 11, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6618
840 N.Y.S.2d 921