From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Franklin Cnty.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 6, 2015
368 N.C. 409 (N.C. 2015)

Opinion

No. 462A14.

11-06-2015

Aaron BYRD and Eric Coombs, Petitioners v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, North Carolina, Respondent.

George B. Currin, Raleigh, for petitioner-appellants. Davis, Sturges & Tomlinson, Louisburg, by Aubrey S. Tomlinson, Jr., for respondent-appellee. Williams Mullen, Raleigh, by Camden R. Webb, for Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., amicus curiae.


George B. Currin, Raleigh, for petitioner-appellants.

Davis, Sturges & Tomlinson, Louisburg, by Aubrey S. Tomlinson, Jr., for respondent-appellee.

Williams Mullen, Raleigh, by Camden R. Webb, for Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.


Summaries of

Byrd v. Franklin Cnty.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 6, 2015
368 N.C. 409 (N.C. 2015)
Case details for

Byrd v. Franklin Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Aaron BYRD and Eric Coombs, Petitioners v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, North…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Nov 6, 2015

Citations

368 N.C. 409 (N.C. 2015)
778 S.E.2d 268

Citing Cases

Frazier v. Town of Blowing Rock

Because "[z]oning regulations are in derogation of common law rights ... they cannot be construed to include…