From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Byrd

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jan 12, 2023
523 P.3d 542 (Nev. 2023)

Opinion

No. 85867

01-12-2023

Kelly BYRD, Appellant, v. Cody Dean BYRD, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The certificate of service of the notice of entry of the challenged order indicates that the notice was served electronically on appellant's counsel on November 9, 2022. Appellant's notice of appeal was due to be filed in the district court within 30 days thereafter—by December 9, 2022. See NRAP 4(a)(1). However, appellant's notice of appeal was not filed in the district court until December 12, 2022. This court lacks jurisdiction to consider an untimely filed notice of appeal. Healy v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft , 103 Nev. 329, 330, 741 P.2d 432, 432 (1987). Accordingly, this court

Appellant mistakenly filed her notice of appeal in this court. The clerk of this court noted on the notice the date it was received—December 12, 2022—and sent it to the district court. See NRAP 4(e). Pursuant to NRAP 4(e), the notice is deemed filed in the district court on December 12, 2022.

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Byrd v. Byrd

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jan 12, 2023
523 P.3d 542 (Nev. 2023)
Case details for

Byrd v. Byrd

Case Details

Full title:Kelly BYRD, Appellant, v. Cody Dean BYRD, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jan 12, 2023

Citations

523 P.3d 542 (Nev. 2023)