From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byers v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Mar 15, 1930
287 P. 1075 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

No. A-7158.

Opinion Filed March 15, 1930.

Appeal from County Court, Carter County; Arthur Grunert, Judge.

Bill Byers was convicted of unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Reversed.

Dan W. Weldon, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.


The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of having unlawful possession of three half-pints of whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

The evidence of the state was that two deputy sheriffs searched the pool hall of the defendant under a search warrant and found three one-half pints of whisky. The state introduced no other proof to show the intent of the defendant. The possession of three one-half pints of whisky by the defendant was not sufficient evidence to make a prima facie case. The proof must either show possession in excess of one quart or there must be other competent testimony showing the intent of the defendant to violate the Prohibitory Liquor Law (Comp. St. 1921, §§ 6982-7039, as amended) through such possession.

The evidence being insufficient to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is reversed.


Summaries of

Byers v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Mar 15, 1930
287 P. 1075 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

Byers v. State

Case Details

Full title:BILL BYERS v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 15, 1930

Citations

287 P. 1075 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)
287 P. 1075

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

Where the amount of liquor seized was less than one quart, it was necessary for the state to prove intent to…

Bateman v. State

This statute would have no application to the facts here involved for the reason that the evidence of the…