From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buxton v. Ballard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Apr 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-4489 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 26, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-4489

04-26-2017

TERRY L. BUXTON, Petitioner, v. DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that Petitioner's request for a stay and abeyance (ECF No. 19) be granted; Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) be denied, without prejudice, as premature, but Respondent's alternate request for a stay and abeyance be granted; Petitioner be granted a stay so that he may pursue his state court remedies for his unexhausted claims and that the stay be conditioned on Petitioner pursuing his state court remedies within thirty (30) days of the date that the order to stay is entered; and Petitioner's habeas petition be held in abeyance pending exhaustion of state court remedies, and Petitioner by required to return to federal court within thirty (30) days after he has exhausted his state court remedies and seek to lift the stay. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that Petitioner's request for a stay and abeyance (ECF No. 19) be GRANTED; Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) be DENIED, without prejudice, as premature, but Respondent's alternate request for a stay and abeyance be GRANTED; Petitioner be GRANTED a STAY so that he may pursue his state court remedies for his unexhausted claims and that the stay be conditioned on Petitioner pursuing his state court remedies within thirty (30) days of the date that the order to stay is entered; and Petitioner's habeas petition be held in ABEYANCE pending exhaustion of state court remedies, and Petitioner by required to return to federal court within thirty (30) days after he has exhausted his state court remedies and seek to lift the stay, consistent with the findings and recommendations.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.

ENTER: April 26, 2017

/s/_________

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Buxton v. Ballard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Apr 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-4489 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Buxton v. Ballard

Case Details

Full title:TERRY L. BUXTON, Petitioner, v. DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION

Date published: Apr 26, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-4489 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 26, 2017)

Citing Cases

Hagood v. Dow

) Accordingly, the court finds Plaintiff's Objections were timely filed. See Buxton v. Ballard, No.…

Davis v. Ames

,” the district court also may deny the unexhausted claims on the merits. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2); see also…