Opinion
SC: 150625-6
07-01-2015
DANIEL BUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee, and SPECIAL TREE REHABILITATION SYSTEM, Intervening Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, and QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant.
Order
150625-6 & (76) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein, Justices COA: 314836, 319312
Wayne CC: 10-006165-NF
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
July 1, 2015
/s/_________
Clerk