From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butterly v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 17, 1932
11 P.2d 510 (Okla. 1932)

Opinion

No. 22318

Opinion Filed May 17, 1932.

(Syllabus.)

1. Drains — Right of Landowners to Damages From Creation of Drainage District — Appeal From Board of Commissioners to District Court.

Under the provisions of chapter 38 (sections 6039-6091), C. O. S. 1921, all persons whose lands are situated without the drainage district and which may be damaged by the creation and establishment of a drainage district may obtain compensation therefor by appearing before the board of county commissioners, acting as drainage commissioners, and have their claims acted upon, and, if not satisfied with their decisions, such persons may appeal therefrom to the district court. Carson v. Oklahoma Dredging Co., 152 Okla. 147, 4 P.2d 71.

2. Same — Demurrer to Petition for Injunction Against Constructing Ditch Properly Sustained.

Record examined; held, that there was no error in sustaining the demurrer to plaintiffs' petition.

Appeal from District Court, Garvin County; Tom P. Pace, Judge.

Injunction by John Butterly and another against the Board of County Commissioners of Garvin County, acting drainage commissioners. Demurrer to petition sustained, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

R.E. Bowling and George M. Nicholson, for plaintiffs in error.

Homer L. Hurt, Co. Atty., Blanton, Osborn Curtis, and Albert Rennie, for defendants in error.


This case presents substantially the same question as decided this day, by this court, in the case of Hoover et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Garvin County (No. 22317), 157 Okla. 225, 13 P.2d 207; the essential difference being that the plaintiffs reside outside of the drainage district, owning property between the mouth of the drainage ditch and the Washita river.

Plaintiffs allege in their petition that the digging, straightening, and deepening of the channel of Wild Horse creek through drainage district No. 2, and emptying the waters back into said creek, which creek thereafter flows through the lands of plaintiffs, will result to their detriment and damage on account of the acceleration of the flow of said waters and the overflowing of same over and across their lands. Plaintiffs pray that the board of county commissioners of Garvin county, acting as drainage commissioners, be enjoined and restrained from letting a contract for the construction of said ditch, or proceeding in any way with said ditch, or changing of the water course, and for all other proper and equitable relief. The court sustained a demurrer of defendant to plaintiffs' petition, and the sole and only question for determination is whether or not the court committed error in sustaining said demurrer. We consider it unnecessary to discuss the contentions raised by plaintiffs. The case of Carson v. Oklahoma Dredging Co., 152 Okla. 147, 4 P.2d 71, is decisive and controlling on the questions herein involved. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

RILEY, HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. LESTER, C. J., and CLARK, V. C. J., absent.


Summaries of

Butterly v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 17, 1932
11 P.2d 510 (Okla. 1932)
Case details for

Butterly v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin County

Case Details

Full title:BUTTERLY et al. v. BOARD of COM'RS of GARVIN COUNTY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: May 17, 1932

Citations

11 P.2d 510 (Okla. 1932)
157 Okla. 161