Summary
In Butler, the court discusses how the extension of a Bivens remedy would "increase the costs of defending such claims," and also "unduly limit officers" in the performance of their discretionary duties.
Summary of this case from Zummer v. SalletOpinion
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00230 SEC P
01-02-2019
MAX RAY BUTLER #09954-011 v. S PORTER ET AL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY
JUDGMENT
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 69] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 56] be GRANTED and that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
THUS DONE in Chambers on this 2nd day of January, 2019.
/s/_________
ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE