From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Moore

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 9, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-786 (S.D. Ohio May. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-786.

May 9, 2006


OPINION AND ORDER


On April 17, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. Petitioner again raises all of the same arguments that were previously presented.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to by petitioner. For the reasons discussed at length in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.

This action is hereby DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Butler v. Moore

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 9, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-786 (S.D. Ohio May. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Butler v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BUTLER, Petitioner, v. ERNIE MOORE, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: May 9, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:05-cv-786 (S.D. Ohio May. 9, 2006)

Citing Cases

Payne v. Tinsley

Because Mr. Payne fails to raise any new arguments or issues in his objection, the Court, after a de novo…

Giron v. Bryant

Because Mr. Giron has failed to raise any new arguments or issues in his objection, this Court, after a de…