From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bustillo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.).


The accident occurred at a Queens intersection when plaintiff (a Queens resident) was struck by a vehicle owned by defendant Dhula (another Queens resident) and operated by defendant Maltese (still another Queens resident), an alleged car thief. The offending vehicle was being hotly pursued by the police at the time.

Defendant Dhula's motion, supported by the municipal defendant, was unopposed, as is these defendants' appeal. Venue in this $10,000,000 personal injury action was required to be lodged "in the county within the city in which the cause of action arose" (CPLR 504). Accordingly, denying removal of the case from New York County was error.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Wallach and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Bustillo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Bustillo v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JUAN BUSTILLO, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 667

Citing Cases

Arjune v. City of New York

Actions against the City are to be brought "in the county within the city in which the cause of action…