From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bustamante v. Wall

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
May 23, 2007
C.A. No. 06-07T (D.R.I. May. 23, 2007)

Opinion

C.A. No. 06-07T.

May 23, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dated May 16, 2007 (document #35) is hereby struck from the record for failure to comply with Local Rule CV 7(d)(2), regarding page limits. Petitioner may have until June 8, 2007 to re-file his Objection in compliance with the attached Addendum on Page Limits.

Appendix A — Page Limits

Unless otherwise permitted, by the Court, for good cause shown, documents filed in support of or in opposition to any motion or appeal shall not exceed the following page limits:Memoranda of Law Statements of Undisputed Fact Appendices, Exhibits and Other Supporting Documents Exceptions to Page Limitations 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 2254 2255

1. . A memorandum of law in support of or in opposition to a motion shall not exceed ten (10) pages; provided, however, that memoranda in support of or in opposition to motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, a bankruptcy appeal or an administrative appeal shall not exceed twenty (20) pages. Reply memoranda may not exceed five (5) pages. 2. . Statements of undisputed facts relating to motions for summary judgment shall not exceed ten (10) pages. 3. . Except as provided in paragraph 4, appendices, exhibits and any other documents whatsoever, regardless of how they are denominated, shall not exceed ten (10) pages in the aggregate; or, in the case of a motion for summary judgment, twenty (20) pages in addition to any statement of undisputed facts. 4. . The page limitations on memoranda shall apply in all cases. The page limitations on appendices, exhibits and other supporting documents shall not apply to: a. The record in: i. Bankruptcy appeals ii. Cases alleging wrongful denial of ERISA benefits iii. Administrative appeals, including, but not limited to Social Security appeals and IDEA appeals iv. Any other case involving an appeal from an administrative body in which the Court is required to review the entire record or a substantial portion of the record of the proceeding below. b. Discovery documents submitted with a motion to compel discovery to the extent necessary to inform the Court of the requests and responses that were made. c. Transcripts of court proceedings submitted in connection with prisoner petitions pursuant to , and/or § . d. Exhibit Lists, Copies of Exhibits, Requested Jury Instructions and any Other Documents Required to be Filed in Connection with Pretrial Memoranda.


Summaries of

Bustamante v. Wall

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
May 23, 2007
C.A. No. 06-07T (D.R.I. May. 23, 2007)
Case details for

Bustamante v. Wall

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN BUSTAMANTE, Petitioner v. ASHBELL T. WALL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Rhode Island

Date published: May 23, 2007

Citations

C.A. No. 06-07T (D.R.I. May. 23, 2007)