From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bush v. Perry

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 28, 2015
610 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6637

07-28-2015

JOHN PATRICK BUSH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. FRANK L. PERRY, Respondent - Appellee.

John Patrick Bush, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00159-FDW) Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Patrick Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Patrick Bush seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bush has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Bush v. Perry

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 28, 2015
610 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Bush v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:JOHN PATRICK BUSH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. FRANK L. PERRY, Respondent …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 28, 2015

Citations

610 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Alexander v. United States

They are inapplicable to determining timeliness of a petition filed under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.…