From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bush v. Hague

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 2, 1934
191 N.E. 5 (Ohio 1934)

Opinion

No. 24613

Decided May 2, 1934.

Constitutional law — Securities Act — Section 6873-3, General Code (110 Ohio Laws, 276) — Bond of dealer or agent — Surety, accepting benefits, cannot challenge constitutionality of statute.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Guernsey county.

Mr. Phil S. Bradford and Mr. Charles S. Druggan, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Charles S. Sheppard, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of New York Central Rd. Co. v. City of Bucyrus, 126 Ohio St. 558, this court being of opinion that the plaintiffs in error are estopped to question the constitutionality of Section 6373-3( d), General Code.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, JONES, MATTHIAS, BEVIS, ZIMMERMAN and WILKIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bush v. Hague

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 2, 1934
191 N.E. 5 (Ohio 1934)
Case details for

Bush v. Hague

Case Details

Full title:BUSH ET AL. v. HAGUE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 2, 1934

Citations

191 N.E. 5 (Ohio 1934)
191 N.E. 5

Citing Cases

Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Philippi

In addition to the authorities cited in the briefs of counsel, there has also been filed with us the written…