From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burton v. Temple University

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 11, 1975
335 A.2d 830 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1975)

Summary

In Burton v. Temple University Law School, 18 Pa. Commw. 306, 335 A.2d 830 (1975), this Court, relying upon Mooney, held that a mandamus action against the university could not be brought in this Court because the university was not a State agency.

Summary of this case from Gelman v. Phila. Port Corp.

Opinion

April 11, 1975.

Mandamus — Jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania — Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act of 1970, Act 1970, July 31, P.L. 673 — State agency — Temple University.

1. The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania is granted original jurisdiction by provisions of the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act of 1970, Act 1970, July 31, P.L. 673, over mandamus actions brought against state agencies. [307-8]

2. Temple University is a non-profit corporation chartered for educational purposes and not a State agency, although it receives financial aid from the State. [307-8]

Submitted on briefs, January 20, 1975, to President Judge BOWMAN and Judges CRUMLISH, JR., KRAMER, WILKINSON, JR., MENCER, ROGERS and BLATT.

Original jurisdiction, No. 1368 C.D. 1974, in case of Valeria Lynn Burton v. Temple University Law School. Complaint in mandamus in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania to grant an appeal and rehearing following denial of a petition for readmission as a law student. Defendant filed preliminary objections. Held: Preliminary objections sustained. Cause transferred to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Valeria Lynn Burton, plaintiff, for herself.

Peter Platten, with him Richard Z. Freemann, Jr., and of counsel, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews Ingersoll, for defendant.


Plaintiff files this action in mandamus against Temple University Law School in this Court's original jurisdiction. The defendant has filed preliminary objections, inter alia, questioning this Court's jurisdiction to hear the issue.

In its brief, defendant points out that Temple University Law School is not a legal entity subject to suit in any form but does not formally raise this objection in order to raise the principal issue relating to Temple University, a legal entity subject to suit in a proper forum.

We will dispose of the matter on the narrow but essential question of whether the defendant is a State agency within the meaning of Section 401(a)(1) of the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act of 1970, Act of July 31, 1970, P.L. 673, as amended, 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 211.401(a)(1) (Supp. 1974-1975). Plaintiff has alleged in paragraph 2 of her complaint in mandamus that Temple University Law School is a State agency. However, this Court and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania have definitely and specifically held, as a matter of law, that it is not. In Mooney v. Temple University Board of Trustees, this Court with an opinion by Judge CRUMLISH, 4 Pa. Commw. 392, 285 A.2d 909 (1972), and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, with an opinion by Justice ROBERTS, 448 Pa. 424, 292 A.2d 395 (1972), held that Temple University is not a State agency. There, the issue raised on preliminary objection was the applicability of the "Inspection and Copying Records Act," Act of June 21, 1957, P.L. 390, as amended, 65 P. S. § 66.1. The Act would have applied if Temple University were a State agency; however, Justice ROBERTS stated:

Unofficial title.

"We conclude, as did the Commonwealth Court, that this latter declaration reveals an express legislative intent to preserve Temple's status as a nonprofit corporation chartered for educational purposes. The receipt by Temple of increased state financial aid no more transforms Temple into a state 'agency' than the receipt of federal funds can make Temple an agency of the federal government." 448 Pa. at 430, 292 A.2d at 399.

Since Temple University is not a State agency but rather a non-profit corporation chartered for educational purposes, this Court is without jurisdiction and we enter the following

ORDER

NOW, April 11, 1975, the preliminary objection raising the question of jurisdiction is sustained. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 503(b) of the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act of 1970, 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 211.503(b), the above matter is hereby transferred to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County and the Chief Clerk shall certify to the Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County a photocopy of the docket entries of the above appeal and transmit to him the record of said appeal. The Chief Clerk is further directed to mail copies of this transfer order to all counsel.


Summaries of

Burton v. Temple University

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 11, 1975
335 A.2d 830 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1975)

In Burton v. Temple University Law School, 18 Pa. Commw. 306, 335 A.2d 830 (1975), this Court, relying upon Mooney, held that a mandamus action against the university could not be brought in this Court because the university was not a State agency.

Summary of this case from Gelman v. Phila. Port Corp.
Case details for

Burton v. Temple University

Case Details

Full title:Valeria Lynn Burton, Plaintiff, v. Temple University Law School, Defendant

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 11, 1975

Citations

335 A.2d 830 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1975)
335 A.2d 830

Citing Cases

Valentine Co. v. Commonwealth

Thus, all of the Temple entities claiming immunity from the surplus lines tax in this case are nonprofit…

Greenfield, et al. v. Pa. Ins. Guar. Assoc

The Act of August 7, 1963, P.L. 549, as amended, 24 P. S. § 5101 et seq., reveals that PHEAA is denominated a…