From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burt v. Ozmint

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 1, 2012
479 F. App'x 551 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6821

10-01-2012

SAMUEL BURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JON OZMINT, Director; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; W. EAGLETON; S. SKIPPER; J. SLIGH; J. BETHEA; W. MCCRAE; MR. JACOBS; S. GOLDBERG; M. C. LINDSEY; C. FLORIAN; MS. HOOKS, Defendants - Appellees.

Samuel Burt, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00247-SB) Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Burt, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Burt appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burt v. Ozmint, No. 3:11-cv-00247-SB (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Burt v. Ozmint

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 1, 2012
479 F. App'x 551 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Burt v. Ozmint

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL BURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JON OZMINT, Director; SOUTH…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 1, 2012

Citations

479 F. App'x 551 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Bolick v. Tomkins

One of the issues raised by Plaintiff is whether the proper extradition proceedings were followed; therefore,…

Beaufort v. Thompson

As such, courts in this district have held that South Carolina agencies and officials cannot be sued in their…