Opinion
Argued December 23, 1892
Decided January 17, 1893
John C. Shaw for appellant.
Joseph F. Mosher for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Burt v. Lustig
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1893
33 N.E. 336 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Burt v. Lustig
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1893
33 N.E. 336 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Burt v. Lustig
Case Details
Full title:GEORGE BURT, Respondent, v . ARNOLD LUSTIG, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 17, 1893
Citations
33 N.E. 336 (N.Y. 1893)
137 N.Y. 538
50 N.Y. St. Rptr. 930
Citing Cases
Hanby v. Cahaba Coal Co.
The supersedeas stood merely as a collateral assurance that the judgment would be paid, if affirmed, and, as…