From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bursten v. Phillips

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 6, 1965
351 F.2d 616 (9th Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 19410.

October 6, 1965.

James O. Warner, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Daniel L. Stack, Launer, Chaffee Hanna, Fullerton, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.


Appeal from an order denying a preliminary injunction. It appears that the matter is moot, and that the appeal should be dismissed. Appellant asserts that the findings that the trial court made purport to dispose of the merits of the action. That is not their effect. Ordinarily, the findings made on motion for preliminary injunction, even though they relate, in whole or in part, to issues going to the merits of the case, are not determinative of those issues at trial. (See Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc., 9 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 804.) We see no reason to depart from the ordinary rule in this case. Appellant, at trial of the merits, will be entitled to have new findings made as to all material issues. There is no need to order the findings vacated.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Bursten v. Phillips

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 6, 1965
351 F.2d 616 (9th Cir. 1965)
Case details for

Bursten v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:Leonard BURSTEN, Appellant, v. William J. PHILLIPS, Sidney J. Adler…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 6, 1965

Citations

351 F.2d 616 (9th Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

N.L.R.B. v. Acker Industries, Inc.

Ordinarily, findings made on motion for preliminary injunction, even though they relate in whole or in part…

Nat. Retailer Corp. of Ariz. v. Valley Nat. Bank

The findings entered by Judge Frey in denying plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction are not binding…