From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burr v. Perkins

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 3, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cv-00786 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 3, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-cv-00786.

February 3, 2006


ORDER


On August 20, 2004, Thomas Burr ("plaintiff") filed suit against Mark Perkins ("Perkins"), Travis Tharp ("Tharp"), and the City of Mount Vernon ("Mount Vernon"). Defendants Perkins and Tharp are Mount Vernon police officers. Plaintiff's complaint alleges numerous federal and state law violations stemming from plaintiff's arrest during the early morning hours of May 16, 2004. Plaintiff alleges that defendants violated his constitutional rights under the 4th, 8th and 14th Amendments as made applicable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by falsely arresting, using unreasonable force against, and maliciously prosecuting plaintiff. Plaintiff also alleges that defendants Perkins and Tharp conspired to deny plaintiff equal protection of the law under 42 U.S.C. § 1985. Pendant state law claims include assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, intentional or negligent defamation, and violations of the Ohio Constitution. Lastly, plaintiff seeks to recover punitive damages from Mount Vernon as defendants' acts resulted from the customs and polices of the Mount Vernon police department.

All defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings with respect to the 8th and 14th amendment claims, negligent defamation claims, and Ohio Constitution claims. Mount Vernon also moved for judgment on all the pendant state law claims and on plaintiff claim for punitive damages.

In plaintiff's response, filed on December 29, 2005 (document 26), he acknowledges that the following claims should be dismissed: The 8th and 14th amendment claims against all defendants, the conspiracy claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 against Perkins and Tharp, the state constitutional claim against all defendants, the negligent defamation claim against all defendants, all pendent state law claims against Mount Vernon, and the punitive damages claim against Mount Vernon.

Pursuant to plaintiff's express abandonment of the above-mentioned claims, they are hereby dismissed. This matter shall continue with respect to plaintiff's 4th amendment claims against all defendants and pendant state law claims of assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment against defendants Perkins and Tharp.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burr v. Perkins

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 3, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cv-00786 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Burr v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Burr, Plaintiff, v. Mark Perkins, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 3, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:04-cv-00786 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 3, 2006)