From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnside v. Sanders Associates, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A
Mar 27, 1981
643 F.2d 389 (5th Cir. 1981)

Summary

noting that a subsidiary is a separate entity for citizenship purposes unless the subsidiary "is not really a 'separate entity'"

Summary of this case from Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Prop. Risk Servs. Mgmt. II

Opinion

No. 80-1161.

March 27, 1981.

Berman, Fichtner Mitchell, Harold B. Berman, Douglas E. Yeager, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Thompson, Knight, Simmons Bullion, John A. Mackintosh, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for Sanders Assoc.

Jackson, Walker, Winstead, Cantwell Miller, Jack Pew, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for Harris Corp. and Harris Data.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Robert M. Hill, Judge.

Before RUBIN and GARZA, Circuit Judges, and SUTTLE, District Judge.

District Judge of Western District of Texas, sitting by designation.


We affirm the judgment appealed from for the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion, published at 507 F. Supp. 165 (N.D.Tex. 1980).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Burnside v. Sanders Associates, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A
Mar 27, 1981
643 F.2d 389 (5th Cir. 1981)

noting that a subsidiary is a separate entity for citizenship purposes unless the subsidiary "is not really a 'separate entity'"

Summary of this case from Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Prop. Risk Servs. Mgmt. II
Case details for

Burnside v. Sanders Associates, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE BURNSIDE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SANDERS ASSOCIATES, INC., HARRIS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A

Date published: Mar 27, 1981

Citations

643 F.2d 389 (5th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

Passek v. Brock Servs., LLC

In making that determination, courts will consider such matters as the degree of control exercised by the…

J.A. Olson Co. v. City of Winona, Miss

The reasoning of Panalpina, however, leads only to the conclusion that Olson may not take advantage of the…