From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. Suntrust Mortg. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Feb 1, 2012
No.1:11-cv-3153-CL (D. Or. Feb. 1, 2012)

Opinion

No.1:11-cv-3153-CL

02-01-2012

JACK W. BURNS and LAURA J. BURNS, Plaintiffs, v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.

Rich L. Billin, OSB No. 904546 Attorney at Law, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiffs


Rich L. Billin, OSB No. 904546

Attorney at Law, P.C.

Attorney for Plaintiffs

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

In accordance with FRCP 65, plaintiffs Jack W. Burns and Laura J. Burns (collectively "plaintiffs") and defendants SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. ("SunTrust") and First American Title Insurance Company ("First American") (collectively "defendants") agree to entry of an order reflecting the following:

1. Plaintiffs' property (hereinafter "the Property") is legally described in Exhibit A at page 17 attached to Plaintiffs' Complaint, and is commonly known as 2843 Dark Hollow Road, Med ford, Oregon 97501.

2. On or about December 16, 2011, plaintiffs filed this action.

3. Defendants then postponed the foreclosure sale set for December 28. 2011 to February 8, 2012.

4. On or about December 23, 2011, this Court issued a temporary restraining order restraining defendants from proceeding with the foreclosure sale of the Property scheduled for December 28, 2011.

5. Upon plaintiffs' unopposed motion to continue the show cause hearing, and by order of this Court dated January 3, 2012, the preliminary injunction hearing set for January 4, 2012 was rescheduled to February 1, 2012.

6. Based on discussions between the parties and to preserve resources that would otherwise be used to prosecute and defend a preliminary injunction hearing, the parties agree that defendants should be restrained from proceeding with the February 8, 2012 foreclosure sale, or any foreclosure sale of the Property, until the earlier of August 8, 2012, or until this preliminary injunction is dissolved by this Court upon a decision on the merits of plaintiffs case, or dissolved by this Court upon an agreement of the parties.

7. The parties further agree that this Court should take the preliminary injunction hearing currently set for February 1, 2012, off its calendar.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Based upon the reasons above, and the agreement of the parties, defendants are HEREBY RESTRAINED from proceeding with the February 8, 2012, foreclosure sale, or any foreclosure sale of the Property until the sooner of:

1. The date that this preliminary injunction is dissolved by this Court upon a decision on the merits of plaintiffs' case; or

2. The date that this preliminary injunction is dissolved by this Court upon an agreement of the parties; or

3. August 8, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

JUDGE OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Burns v. Suntrust Mortg. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Feb 1, 2012
No.1:11-cv-3153-CL (D. Or. Feb. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Burns v. Suntrust Mortg. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JACK W. BURNS and LAURA J. BURNS, Plaintiffs, v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION

Date published: Feb 1, 2012

Citations

No.1:11-cv-3153-CL (D. Or. Feb. 1, 2012)