From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. Hacker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 18, 1998
729 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-389

Opinion filed December 18, 1998 JULY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, O. H. Eaton, Jr., Judge.

Jack B. Nichols, Orlando, for Appellant.

Steven Hacker and Nancy Hacker, Maitland, in proper person.


AFFIRMED

GRIFFEN.C.J., DAUKSCH and PETERSON ,JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING


Appellant has moved for rehearing. We consider his motion as one for clarification and say that the trial court correctly ruled that it was without jurisdiction to consider his claim because it did not meet the jurisdictional amount threshold of $15,000. Therefore, appellant must file his claim in county court. The motion for rehearing is otherwise denied.

MOTION GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and PETERSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Burns v. Hacker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 18, 1998
729 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Burns v. Hacker

Case Details

Full title:RONALD A. BURNS, JR., D/B/A CREATIVE CARS, etc., Appellant, v. STEVEN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 18, 1998

Citations

729 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Burns v. Hacker

50 of allegedly substandard car repairs, makes its third (and hopefully last) appearance before this court.…