From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Feb 21, 2012
No. 2:11-CV-151-GZS (D. Me. Feb. 21, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CV-151-GZS

02-21-2012

AMY ELIZABETH BURNS, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (Docket No. 13) filed January 31, 2012, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's Decision is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision.

George Z. Singal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Burns v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Feb 21, 2012
No. 2:11-CV-151-GZS (D. Me. Feb. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Burns v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:AMY ELIZABETH BURNS, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Feb 21, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-CV-151-GZS (D. Me. Feb. 21, 2012)

Citing Cases

Propst v. Colvin

1181392, at *26 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 13, 2015) (unpublished) (describing as "fundamentally flawed" the…

Crabtree v. Berryhill

. 13, 2015) (unpublished) (describing as "fundamentally flawed" the plaintiff's argument that, because the…