From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnham v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jun 13, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-1564 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 13, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-1564

06-13-2020

SCOTTIE BURNHAM, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending are the parties' cross Motions for Summary Judgment (Document Nos. 10 & 11). The Court has received from the Magistrate Judge a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED, and that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be AFFIRMED. Plaintiff has filed Objections (Document No. 15) to the Memorandum and Recommendation. The Court, after having made a de novo determination of the Motions for Summary Judgment, and Memorandum and Recommendation, and Plaintiff's Objections, is of the opinion that the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are correct and should be and hereby are accepted by the Court in their entirety. Accordingly,

It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed and entered on April 14, 2020, which is adopted in its entirety as the opinion of this Court, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 11) is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 10) is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

The Clerk will enter this Order and send copies to all parties of record.

Signed at Houston, Texas this 13TH day of June, 2020.

/s/_________

EWING WERLEIN, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Burnham v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jun 13, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-1564 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Burnham v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:SCOTTIE BURNHAM, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Jun 13, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-1564 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 13, 2020)

Citing Cases

Scott R. v. Kijakazi

, the VE Handbook is outside the certified record and is not binding source of law. E.g., Burnham v. Saul,…

Cavanaugh v. Saul

Graves did not—and based on the conflicting case law, cannot—establish a direct and obvious conflict between…