From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnett v. Superior Court of Marin County

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 5, 1983
573 F. Supp. 345 (N.D. Cal. 1983)

Opinion

No. C-82-4703 SAW.

October 5, 1983

Robert L. Burnett, in pro. per.


ORDER


Petitioner Burnett requests this Court to issue a writ of mandate requiring the Superior Court of Marin County to act in conformity with what Burnett contends is that court's policy of acting upon a writ of habeas corpus within 30 working days of the time a petition for such a writ is filed. Petitioner does not allege that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States; this Court is therefore without jurisdiction to entertain Burnett's petition as a request for habeas corpus relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). Because the Superior Court of Marin County is not an officer, employee or agency of the United States, this Court also lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the state court to perform its alleged duty. See 28 U.S.C. § 1361.

As this Court is without jurisdiction, petitioner's motion for a writ of mandate is hereby denied.


Summaries of

Burnett v. Superior Court of Marin County

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 5, 1983
573 F. Supp. 345 (N.D. Cal. 1983)
Case details for

Burnett v. Superior Court of Marin County

Case Details

Full title:Robert L. BURNETT, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MARIN COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 5, 1983

Citations

573 F. Supp. 345 (N.D. Cal. 1983)

Citing Cases

Pankey v. Webster

Id. Obviously, an action under section 1361 will not lie unless the defendants are officers or employees of…

Enwonwu v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Superior Court

As a final matter, in addition to habeas relief (immediate release from detention), Enwonwu seeks to have his…