From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnett v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Dec 5, 2012
No. CIV 12-158-RAW-SPS (E.D. Okla. Dec. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV 12-158-RAW-SPS

12-05-2012

STEPHEN BURNETT, Plaintiff, v. KATHY MILLER, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

On June 6, 2012, the court denied plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directed him to pay the entire filing fee (Docket No. 6). On June 18, 2012, he filed a motion for reconsideration of the in forma pauperis ruling (Docket No. 9), but paid the entire filing fee on July 13, 2012. The court denied the motion for reconsideration on August 27, 2012 (Docket No. 28). On that same date, the court entered an Order Staying Proceedings and Requiring Special Report, directing the defendants to file within 60 days a written report addressing the allegations in the complaint, along with the defendants' answer or dispositive motion (Docket No. 30). Those filings are more than a month overdue.

On September 17, 2012, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the denial of his in forma pauperis application (Docket No. 31), and the appeal still is pending before the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Because plaintiff has paid the required filing fee for this action, the appeal did not affect the schedule of this case. Plaintiff alleges the defendants' attorney has advised him by letter that the attorney "believed" the appeal somehow had stayed the already-stayed case (Docket No. 46 at 1). Defense counsel has not made any filings with the court regarding this issue.

On October 31, 2012, the court allowed plaintiff to file a motion for an emergency injunction, because he was claiming a denial of treatment for his serious medical needs (Docket No. 41). The motion, however, was found to be meritless (Docket No. 52). Plaintiff is hereby advised again of the instructions set forth in the Order Staying Proceedings and Requiring Special Report:

All pending motions in this case are hereby stricken without prejudice. No [additional] applications, motion, or discovery should be filed or considered until the steps set forth in this Order have been completed, except as the court further orders.
(Docket No. 30 at 2).

ACCORDINGLY, (1) the defendants are directed to show cause in writing within seven (7) days for their failure to comply with the Order Staying Proceedings and Requiring Special Report, and (2) plaintiff's pending motions (Docket Nos. 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, and 51) are stricken without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5thday of December 2012.

____________________________

RONALD A. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Burnett v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Dec 5, 2012
No. CIV 12-158-RAW-SPS (E.D. Okla. Dec. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Burnett v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN BURNETT, Plaintiff, v. KATHY MILLER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Dec 5, 2012

Citations

No. CIV 12-158-RAW-SPS (E.D. Okla. Dec. 5, 2012)