From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnett v. Carrington Health Sys.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 19, 2013
NO. 1:11-CV-0324 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 19, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 1:11-CV-0324

02-19-2013

DEMETTRESS ARLENE BURNETT, Plaintiff, v. CARRINGTON HEALTH SYSTEMS, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 45), to which no objections were filed. In her Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915 (doc. 44) be denied.

Having reviewed this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's report to be thorough, well-reasoned, and correct. Accordingly, the Court adopts and affirms the report in its entirety. Plaintiff's motion is therefore DENIED (doc. 44).

SO ORDERED.

_______________

S. Arthur Spiegel

United States Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Burnett v. Carrington Health Sys.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 19, 2013
NO. 1:11-CV-0324 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Burnett v. Carrington Health Sys.

Case Details

Full title:DEMETTRESS ARLENE BURNETT, Plaintiff, v. CARRINGTON HEALTH SYSTEMS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

NO. 1:11-CV-0324 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 19, 2013)