From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burlingame v. Becker Brothers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 25, 2011
797 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 2011)

Opinion

No. A11-286.

May 25, 2011.

James E: Lindell, Lindell LaVoie, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Craig B. Nichols, Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug Bradt, P.L.L.P., St. Paul, MN, for relators.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea

Chief Justice


Summaries of

Burlingame v. Becker Brothers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 25, 2011
797 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 2011)
Case details for

Burlingame v. Becker Brothers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Michael J. BURLINGAME, Respondent, v. BECKER BROTHERS, INC., and Builders…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: May 25, 2011

Citations

797 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 2011)