From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burley v. United Parcel Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 28, 2017
No. 3:17-cv-0370 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 28, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-0370

02-28-2017

IVAN BURLEY Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, et al. Defendants.


MEMORANDUM

The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, is a pre-trial detainee at the Correctional Development Center for Men in Nashville. He brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the United Parcel Service (UPS) and Megan Humphries, a UPS employee, seeking damages.

Humphries is employed at a UPS store in Hendersonville, Tennessee. On two separate occasions in October, 2015, she opened a package addressed to a post office box leased to the plaintiff. In the packages, Humphries found what she thought might be illegal drugs. She reported the discovery to the authorities who later placed the plaintiff under arrest.

The plaintiff believes that Humphries violated his rights by opening the packages without cause and reporting him to the police.

To establish a claim for § 1983 relief, the plaintiff must plead and prove that a person or persons, while acting under color of state law, deprived him of some right guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981).

Clearly, the defendants were private individuals who were not acting "under color of state law" when the plaintiff's packages were opened. Thus, they are not liable to the plaintiff under § 1983. Besides, Humphries allegedly violated the plaintiff's rights in October, 2015 when she opened the plaintiff's packages. It appears, therefore, that the instant action is time-barred by the one year statute of limitations imposed upon civil rights claims brought in Tennessee. Merriweather v. City of Memphis, 107 F.3d 396, 398 (6th Cir.1997).

In the absence of an actionable claim, the Court is obliged to dismiss the complaint sua sponte. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

An appropriate order will be entered.

/s/_________

Aleta A. Trauger

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Burley v. United Parcel Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 28, 2017
No. 3:17-cv-0370 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Burley v. United Parcel Serv.

Case Details

Full title:IVAN BURLEY Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 28, 2017

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-0370 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 28, 2017)

Citing Cases

Burley v. Sumner Cnty. 18th Judicial Drug Task Force

All four of those cases were dismissed at the initial review stage. See Memorandum Opinion, Burley v. United…

Burley v. Dixon

He filed the first case in February 2017, and the Court dismissed it for two reasons: neither Dixon nor UPS…