From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burkhart v. Banales

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 26, 2009
CV 08-3623-GAF(RC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2009)

Opinion


STEVEN LAWRENCE BURKHART, Plaintiff, v. DR. FREDERICO BANALES, PH.D., M.D.; DR. GABRIELLE PALADINO, PH.D., M.D., Defendants. No. CV 08-3623-GAF(RC) United States District Court, C.D. California. March 26, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.

         IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; and (2) the action is found to be untimely, and the complaint and action are dismissed on that ground.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation by the United States mail on the plaintiff.


Summaries of

Burkhart v. Banales

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 26, 2009
CV 08-3623-GAF(RC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Burkhart v. Banales

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN LAWRENCE BURKHART, Plaintiff, v. DR. FREDERICO BANALES, PH.D.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 26, 2009

Citations

CV 08-3623-GAF(RC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2009)