From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. Postmaster Gen.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Apr 12, 2018
No. 17-11046 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-11046

04-12-2018

STACY BURKE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants - Appellees.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cv-00090-RH-GRJ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida Before WILSON, JORDAN, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham, United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. --------

We have considered all of Stacey Burke's specifications of error. We have reviewed de novo the following:

1. Did the district court err in granting the Postal Service's motion for judgment as a matter of law on the race discrimination claim?

2. Did the district court err in granting the Postal Service's motion for judgment as a matter of law on the retaliation claim?

After careful review of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. The decision of the district court is

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Burke v. Postmaster Gen.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Apr 12, 2018
No. 17-11046 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Burke v. Postmaster Gen.

Case Details

Full title:STACY BURKE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.S. ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 12, 2018

Citations

No. 17-11046 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2018)

Citing Cases

Griffin v. Gen. Elec. Aviation

Burke v. Brennan, 2017 WL 487021, at *6 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 6, 2017), aff'd sub nom. Burke v. Postmaster …