From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. Mesniaeff

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 24, 2018
328 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2018)

Opinion

01-24-2018

Elizabeth BURKE v. Gregory MESNIAEFF

Campbell D. Barrett, Anne C. Dranginis, Jon T. Kukucka and Johanna S. Katz, in support of the petition. Charles S. Harris and Stephanie C. Laska, in opposition.


Campbell D. Barrett, Anne C. Dranginis, Jon T. Kukucka and Johanna S. Katz, in support of the petition.

Charles S. Harris and Stephanie C. Laska, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 177 Conn. App. 824, 173 A.3d 393 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's judgment when it determined that (1) the trial court did not improperly charge the jury on the defendant's justification defense of criminal trespass, (2) the special defense of others was not barred by insufficient evidence, and (3) no finding needed to be made on the plaintiff's rights to the property?"

McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Burke v. Mesniaeff

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 24, 2018
328 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2018)
Case details for

Burke v. Mesniaeff

Case Details

Full title:Elizabeth BURKE v. Gregory MESNIAEFF

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 24, 2018

Citations

328 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2018)
177 A.3d 564

Citing Cases

Burke v. Mesniaeff

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the…