From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 14, 2004
862 So. 2d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 2D03-2495.

Opinion filed January 14, 2004.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County, Wayne L. Cobb, Judge.


Clarence Burgess appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We affirm the trial court's denial of the motion on the ground that it is facially insufficient. See Saffold v. State, 850 So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b)(3), (4). Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Burgess may have to file a facially sufficient motion within sixty days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case. See Saffold, 850 So.2d at 577-78; Cherryhomes v. State, 857 So.2d 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Affirmed.

FULMER, VILLANTI, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.


Summaries of

Burgess v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 14, 2004
862 So. 2d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Burgess v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 14, 2004

Citations

862 So. 2d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)