From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. County of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jun 14, 2021
21-cv-616-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-616-MMA (MSB)

06-14-2021

MATTHEW BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT GORE'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [DOC. NO. 4]

Hon. Michael M. Anello United States District Judge

Matthew Burgess (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant William Gore (“Gore”) jointly move “for an Order suspending . . . Gore's deadline to respond [to] Plaintiff's Complaint and also extending Gore's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's intended First Amended Complaint [“FAC”] for twenty one (21) days after Plaintiff serves that amended complaint on the County of San Diego.” See Doc. No. 4 at 2 (citation omitted). Good cause appearing and pursuant to Civil Local Rule 12.2 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) and 15(a), the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a FAC on or before June 28, 2021 and ORDERS Gore to respond to Plaintiffs forthcoming FAC within twenty-one days after Plaintiff serves the FAC on Gore.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Burgess v. County of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jun 14, 2021
21-cv-616-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Burgess v. County of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

21-cv-616-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)