From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. County of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
21-cv-616-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-616-MMA (MSB)

07-01-2021

MATTHEW BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC. NO. 7]

Hon. Michael M. Anello United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Matthew Burgess and Defendants David Nisleit and Jeremy Huff (“Defendants”) jointly move for an extension of time within which Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See Doc. No. 7. Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion and ORDERS that Defendants answer or otherwise respond to the FAC on or before August 10, 2021 .

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burgess v. County of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
21-cv-616-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Burgess v. County of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jul 1, 2021

Citations

21-cv-616-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)