From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. Affiliated Computer Servs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 2, 2012
Civil No. 3:11-0927 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:11-0927

02-02-2012

SHAWNELLIAS BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., Defendant.


Judge Trauger

Magistrate Judge Brown


ORDER

On January 13, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 30), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 14) is DENIED, and the Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Docket No. 16) is GRANTED.

This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further handling under the original referral Order.

It is so ORDERED.

___________

ALETA A. TRAUGER

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Burgess v. Affiliated Computer Servs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 2, 2012
Civil No. 3:11-0927 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Burgess v. Affiliated Computer Servs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHAWNELLIAS BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 2, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 3:11-0927 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 2, 2012)