From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burfitt v. Cunningham

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 2, 2022
3:20-cv-1757-JGC (N.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-1757-JGC

03-02-2022

Lawrence R. Burfitt, Plaintiff, v. Joseph Cunningham, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT ENTRY

James G. Carr Sr. U.S. District Judge

For the reasons stated in the Order filed, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's claims under the First and Eighth Amendment (Doc. 28) be, and the same hereby is granted.

An appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, as jurists of reason could not rationally dispute either its rationale or result. Therefore, to maintain an appeal, Plaintiff must prepay the requisite filing fee in advance.

So ordered. 1


Summaries of

Burfitt v. Cunningham

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 2, 2022
3:20-cv-1757-JGC (N.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Burfitt v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence R. Burfitt, Plaintiff, v. Joseph Cunningham, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-1757-JGC (N.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2022)

Citing Cases

Jenkins v. Dahlby

. Citing to Burfitt v. Cunningham, No. 3:20-cv-1757 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2022), Defendants contend…