Opinion
No. 67651
07-23-2015
THOMAS C. BURDSAL, Petitioner, v. THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PERSHING; AND THE HONORABLE MICHAEL MONTERO, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents.
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the district court's apparent failure to rule on a 2013 motion to set aside a default, as well on other pending motions.
Having reviewed the petition, we are not persuaded that mandamus relief is warranted. NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (noting that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). We therefore deny the petition. NRAP 21(b)(1). Notwithstanding the denial of this petition, we are confident that the district court will rule on any pending motions in a timely manner, if it has not already done so.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge
Thomas C. Burdsal
Attorney General/Carson City
Attorney General/Las Vegas
Pershing County Clerk