; Buntyn v. CJC, Madison Cnty. Jail, No. 20-1108-JDT-CGC, 2020 WL 3947333, at *3 (W.D. Tenn. July 10, 2020) (holding on initial review that no First Amendment claim existed where even though prisoner's outgoing mail was read, prisoner did not allege that it was privileged legal mail) (citing Meadows v. Hopkins, 713 F.2d 206, 208-11 (6th Cir. 1983)); Longmire, 2019 WL 3282678, at *5 (W.D. Mich. July 22, 2019). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff's claims of not being able to contact his family, the removal of his chirp device, and the screening of his mail.