From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bunn v. Suddath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jul 11, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-47 (W.D. La. Jul. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-47

07-11-2012

TIMOTHY E. BUNN v. WARDEN BRAD SUDDATH


JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KIRK


JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein and after a de novo review of the record, including the objections filed by the plaintiff, having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights complaint be and is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(b).

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 11th day of July, 2012.

_______________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bunn v. Suddath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jul 11, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-47 (W.D. La. Jul. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Bunn v. Suddath

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY E. BUNN v. WARDEN BRAD SUDDATH

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-47 (W.D. La. Jul. 11, 2012)