From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bunch v. Marshall

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Dec 6, 2021
4:21cv431 WMW (D. Minn. Dec. 6, 2021)

Opinion

4:21cv431 WMW

12-06-2021

Gloria Arnetta Bunch, Plaintiff, v. Denzil P. Marshall, Attorney; Luther Sutter, PLLC, Attorney; Lucien R. Gillham, Attorney; Mel Sayes, Attorney, Matthews Sanders & Sayes; Dylan H. Potts, Attorney; Joann Maxey, General Counsel at UAMS System; William Cash, Jr., Attorney and Director of EEOC; and Stark Ligon, Former Executive Director of Office of Professional Conduct, Attorney, Defendants.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

[x] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT:

1. Plaintiff Gloria Arnetta Bunch's application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. 1), is GRANTED.
2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Bunch v. Marshall

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Dec 6, 2021
4:21cv431 WMW (D. Minn. Dec. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Bunch v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:Gloria Arnetta Bunch, Plaintiff, v. Denzil P. Marshall, Attorney; Luther…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 6, 2021

Citations

4:21cv431 WMW (D. Minn. Dec. 6, 2021)