Bumpus v. Nangalama

Full title: PATRICK BUMPUS, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 9, 2013

2:12-cv-01102 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)

Opinion

PATRICK BUMPUS, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-01102 GEB DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 9, 2013

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         On July 19, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.

         Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion...." On April 30, 2013, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion.

         Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." In the order filed April 30, 2013, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the defendants' July 19, 2013 motion to dismiss. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).