Bullen v. Bac Home Loans Servicing

Full title: Christine Bullen, et al. v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, et al.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Civil No. 11-cv-00309-JL (D.N.H. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-cv-00309-JL

08-23-2011

Christine Bullen, et al. v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, et al.

Joseph N. Laplante

PROCEDURAL ORDER: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

On or before 5:00 p.m., August 25, 2011 the parties shall jointly file:

• a single timeline setting forth all pertinent dates, times, and events, in whatever format the parties jointly choose (in other words, the parties need not comply with Local Rule 5.1(a) with respect to the timeline);
• a single Statement of Agreed Facts followed by a Statement of Disputed Facts. The disputed facts are not an invitation to advocacy (i.e., "The plaintiff can not establish irreparable harm because . . . ." or "There is a strong likelood of success on the merits because . . . ."). The parties should simply list facts they intend to establish at the hearing, or which they contend will not be established at the hearing.

On or before 5:00 p.m. on August 26, 2011, each party shall file:

• a witness list;
• an exhibit list; and
• proposed findings of fact and rulings of law.

Counsel shall confer before the hearing to identify all areas of agreement and disagreement as to the admissibility of each exhibit.

On or before 10:00 a.m. on August 29, 2011, the plaintiff shall file a proposed order in compliance with Rule 65 and Local Rule 65.1. The order shall specifically address the amount of the bond, if any, under Rule 65(c).

SO ORDERED.

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Keriann Roman, Esq.

Jill K. Hauff, Esq.