From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bullard v. Sundstrom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 14, 2017
Case No. 16-cv-12918 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 14, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-12918

09-14-2017

DARRYL BULLARD, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN SUNDSTROM, Defendant.


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHANIE DAWKINS DAVIS ORDER ACCEPTEDING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDTION (#23) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#13)

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Darryl Bullard's claims for relief for Defendant's alleged violations of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis, who issued a Report and Recommendation on August 14, 2017, recommending that the Court grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review of the parties' briefing and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion. Therefore, the Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Davis's August 14, 2017 Report and Recommendation [#23] as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED. Dated: September 14, 2017

s/Gershwin A. Drain

HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Bullard v. Sundstrom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 14, 2017
Case No. 16-cv-12918 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Bullard v. Sundstrom

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL BULLARD, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN SUNDSTROM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 14, 2017

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-12918 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 14, 2017)

Citing Cases

Pleasant-Bey v. United States Cong.

aining that the “substantial burden” inquiry under the analogous Religious Freedom Restoration Act is “not…