From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buffalo Niagara Business Park, LLC v. Board of Assessment Review

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 13, 2014
118 A.D.3d 1315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-06-13

In the Matter of BUFFALO NIAGARA BUSINESS PARK, LLC, Petitioner–Appellant, v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW for CITY OF BUFFALO, Assessor of City of Buffalo, City of Buffalo, Respondents–Respondents, and County of Erie, Intervenor–Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered August 20, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order granted the motions of respondents and intervenor to dismiss. Zdarsky, Sawicki & Agostinelli LLP, Buffalo (Gerald T. Walsh of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Timothy A. Ball, Corporation Counsel, Buffalo (Cavette A. Chambers of Counsel), for Respondents–Respondents.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered August 20, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order granted the motions of respondents and intervenor to dismiss.
Zdarsky, Sawicki & Agostinelli LLP, Buffalo (Gerald T. Walsh of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Timothy A. Ball, Corporation Counsel, Buffalo (Cavette A. Chambers of Counsel), for Respondents–Respondents.
Mosey Persico LLP, Buffalo (Margaret A. Hurley of Counsel), for Intervenor–Respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

Petitioner appeals from an order that, inter alia, granted the motions of respondents and intervenor to dismiss the petition in this tax certiorari proceeding pursuant to the Real Property Tax Law article 7. On appeal, petitioner contends that Supreme Court erred in granting the motions because the petition was timely filed and service was proper. We reject that contention. It is undisputed that petitioner never served the original petition on any party herein and, pursuant to RPTL 702(3), the failure to file and serve the petition “shall constitute a complete defense to the petition and the petition must be dismissed.” In view of our decision, we need not address petitioner's remaining contentions.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Buffalo Niagara Business Park, LLC v. Board of Assessment Review

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 13, 2014
118 A.D.3d 1315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Buffalo Niagara Business Park, LLC v. Board of Assessment Review

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BUFFALO NIAGARA BUSINESS PARK, LLC, Petitioner–Appellant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 13, 2014

Citations

118 A.D.3d 1315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4318
987 N.Y.S.2d 290