From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buenrostro v. Martel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Jul 20, 2011
CV 10-5747-CJC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2011)

Opinion


SALVADOR BUENROSTRO, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Respondent. No. CV 10-5747-CJC (AGR) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. July 20, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice, and that Respondent's motion to dismiss based on expiration of the statute of limitations is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Buenrostro v. Martel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Jul 20, 2011
CV 10-5747-CJC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Buenrostro v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:SALVADOR BUENROSTRO, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Jul 20, 2011

Citations

CV 10-5747-CJC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2011)