From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Budrow v. Grand Union Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 17, 1951
99 N.E.2d 559 (N.Y. 1951)

Opinion

Argued April 5, 1951

Decided May 17, 1951

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, IMRIE, J.

Patrick J. Tierney for appellant.

James J. Carroll for respondent.



Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. There is evidence from which the negligence of defendant and the causation of the accident by that negligence may be reasonably inferred. ( Betzag v. Gulf Oil Corp., 298 N.Y. 358; Bernstein v. Greenfield, 281 N.Y. 77; Cornbrooks v. Terminal Barber Shops, Inc., 282 N.Y. 217.) No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Budrow v. Grand Union Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 17, 1951
99 N.E.2d 559 (N.Y. 1951)
Case details for

Budrow v. Grand Union Company

Case Details

Full title:ANNA BUDROW, Appellant, v. GRAND UNION COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 17, 1951

Citations

99 N.E.2d 559 (N.Y. 1951)
99 N.E.2d 559

Citing Cases

Stein v. State of New York

This obligation she has not discharged. Various conflicts between her testimony, given upon an examination…

Panagakos v. Greek Archdiocese of North & South America

In the bill of particulars, however, it is claimed that defendants created the conditions complained of. And…