From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckley v. Richards

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 10, 2011
No. 4:11CV00722 JLH/JTR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. 4:11CV00722 JLH/JTR

11-10-2011

EARNEST BUCKLEY, ADC #130278 PLAINTIFF v. RICHARDS, Sergeant, Saline County Detention Center DEFENDANT


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Earnest Buckley, is a prisoner in the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction. In this pro se § 1983 action, he alleges that Defendant Sergeant Richards violated his constitutional rights. See docket entry #2.

On October 6, 2011, the Court entered an Order giving Plaintiff thirty days to file an Amended Complaint containing information necessary to complete the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. See docket entry #3. Importantly, the Court advised Plaintiff that the failure to timely and properly do so would result in the dismissal of his case, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Id.

Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) provides that: "It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. A party appearing for himself/herself shall sign his/her pleadings and state his/her address, zip code, and telephone number. If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." (Emphasis added.)

As of the date of this Order of Dismissal, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's October 6, 2011 Order, and the time for doing so has expired.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to Plaintiff's failure to timely and properly comply with the Court's October 6, 2011 Order.

2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order of Dismissal and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Buckley v. Richards

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 10, 2011
No. 4:11CV00722 JLH/JTR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Buckley v. Richards

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST BUCKLEY, ADC #130278 PLAINTIFF v. RICHARDS, Sergeant, Saline…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 10, 2011

Citations

No. 4:11CV00722 JLH/JTR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 10, 2011)