From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckley v. Alameida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2013
Case No. 1:04-cv-05688-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:04-cv-05688-SAB (PC)

05-13-2013

ANTONIO CORTEZ BUCKLEY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF ANTONIO CORTEZ

BUCKLEY IS NO LONGER NEEDED IN THESE

PROCEEDINGS, AND THE WRIT OFHABEAS

CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM IS

DISCHARGED


(ECF Nos. 207 & 212)

Plaintiff Antonio Cortez Buckley ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 29, 2003. This matter is set for jury trial on May 21, 2013 before the undersigned.

On May 10, 2013, Defendants filed a notice of settlement according to Local Rule 160. (ECF No. 212.) Accordingly, Plaintiff Antonio Cortez Buckley, CDCR #E-71421, is no longer needed by the Court in these proceedings, and the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum as to this inmate is HEREBY DISCHARGED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Buckley v. Alameida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2013
Case No. 1:04-cv-05688-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Buckley v. Alameida

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO CORTEZ BUCKLEY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:04-cv-05688-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)