From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckland v. MERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 20, 2012
1: 11-cv-3053-CL (D. Or. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

1: 11-cv-3053-CL

03-20-2012

DAVID M. BUCKLAND, Plaintiff, v. MERS, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#20) . Defendants' motion to dismiss (#19) is GRANTED. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Buckland v. MERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 20, 2012
1: 11-cv-3053-CL (D. Or. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Buckland v. MERS

Case Details

Full title:DAVID M. BUCKLAND, Plaintiff, v. MERS, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

1: 11-cv-3053-CL (D. Or. Mar. 20, 2012)