Buckins v. State

Full title: Derrick Lamar BUCKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Aug 22, 2012

93 So. 3d 1072 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D10–5196.

2012-08-22

Derrick Lamar BUCKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the NineteenthJudicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562007CF002820A. Derrick Lamar Buckins, Wewahitchka, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the NineteenthJudicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562007CF002820A.
Derrick Lamar Buckins, Wewahitchka, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Gutierrez, 10 So.3d 158, 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (where sentence is a result of a plea agreement for a specific sentence, the trial court does not have authority to circumvent that through a motion to mitigate); Kight v. State, 784 So.2d 396, 401 (Fla.2001) (court rejects claims of disparate sentencing where co-defendant's lesser sentence was a result of plea agreement or prosecutorial discretion).

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.